Dalian Eastern Display Co., Ltd.
Dalian Eastern Display Co., Ltd.
The year 2004 marked a significant period in the evolution of LCD technology. While LCDs were gaining popularity, the technology wasn't as refined as it is today. This article will revisit the best LCD options available back then, analyzing their features and placing them in their historical context. Understanding the limitations and advancements of 2004's best LCD monitors helps us appreciate the progress made in display technology.
Choosing the right Best LCD in 2004 involved considering several key factors which were quite different from today's standards. Resolution, response time, and contrast ratio were major differentiators. Screen size also played a considerable role, with larger displays still considered a luxury.
Resolutions in 2004 were considerably lower than what we see today. Common resolutions included 1280x1024 (SXGA) and 1440x900 (WXGA) for desktop monitors. Screen sizes ranged from 15 inches to 22 inches, with larger sizes commanding higher prices. The jump in resolution and size often meant a significant price increase for the best LCD option.
Response time, measured in milliseconds (ms), was a crucial factor for gamers and those sensitive to motion blur. Lower response times were desirable, though even the best LCD options in 2004 typically had response times in the 16ms to 25ms range. This is significantly slower than modern displays, where 1ms response times are achievable.
Contrast ratio determines the difference between the brightest and darkest colors a display can produce. Higher contrast ratios resulted in richer blacks and more vibrant images. While technology was improving, top-tier best LCD models in 2004 generally offered contrast ratios in the 500:1 to 1000:1 range, a far cry from the millions-to-one contrast ratios common today.
While precise sales figures from 2004 are unavailable, various reviews and tech publications of the time provide insights into some of the leading LCD monitors. The following is not an exhaustive list, but a representation of what was considered high-end in 2004:
| Brand/Model | Resolution | Response Time (ms) | Contrast Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dell UltraSharp 2007FP (Dell) | 1600 x 1200 | 16 | 700:1 |
| NEC MultiSync LCD2070NX (NEC) | 1680 x 1050 | 25 | 800:1 |
It's important to note that precise specifications can vary depending on the source and model variations. These examples represent some of the more prominent models available at the time.
The best LCD monitors of 2004, while limited by today's standards, represented significant advancements from CRT technology. They laid the foundation for the widespread adoption of LCD technology. These displays paved the way for the higher resolutions, faster response times, and improved color accuracy we enjoy today. Looking back, we can appreciate the technological journey that has led to the sophisticated display technology available now.
